Department for Communities and Local Government - Local Government Finance Settlement 2012-13
DCLG logo

2012-13 Settlement
Table 4: Annotated Chapter 5 of the LGFR for Ipswich (R264)


Part A - Isles of Scilly

From the total of DCLG Formula Grant which the Secretary of State proposes to pay 
to receiving authorities, which is £22,914,997,611 he proposes to pay £ 2,599,000 with 
respect to the Isles of Scilly 

Part B - Grants Rolling in Using Tailored Distribution = £ 0

From the total of DCLG Formula Grant which the Secretary of State proposes to pay 
to receiving authorities he proposes to pay £  2,004,438,252 with 
respect to grants rolling in using tailored distributions. 

The Secretary of State has decided to amalgamate certain special and specific 
grants for each authority, to give authorities more control over how they may be used.

The Grants Rolling in Using Tailored Distribution is calculated as follows.

Part C - Top-Up to Avoid Losers From Additional £10 million = £ 0

From the total of DCLG Formula Grant which the Secretary of State proposes to pay 
to receiving authorities, he proposes to pay       1,342,597 with 
respect to the authorities which are listed in Annex R. The amount of grant to be 
paid to each such authority from this total of       1,342,597 is the 
amount shown against the name of the authority in Annex R. 

The amounts set out in Annex R ensure that those authorities whose formula grant 
would otherwise have been reduced as a consequence of adding a further £10 million 
into the settlement for shire districts are brought back up to the levels previously 
calculated under the provisional Local Government Finance Report (England) 2012/2013 
published on 31 January 2011.

Part D - Relative Needs Amount = £ 3,952,710

From the remaining total of DCLG Formula Grant which the Secretary of State proposes to pay 
to receiving authorities, after paying the Isles of Scilly, and after paying the Grants 
Rolled In Using Tailored Distributions and Top-Up to Avoid Losers From Additional £10 million, 
which is £20,906,617,762, he proposes to pay  83.0% or 
£17,352,492,743 with respect to the relative needs of authorities.

The Relative Needs Amount is calculated as follows.

(j) Lower-tier services RNF (0.00022315351319) multiplied by 1,000,000 and divided by PROJECTED POPULATION IN 2012 ( 133,119) = 0.00167634607523; (k) The minimum for all authorities of the result of (j) = 0.00138298855115; (l) The result of (j) minus the result of (k) = 0.00029335752408; (m) Mixed-tier services RNF (0.00000352126176) multiplied by 1,000,000 and divided by PROJECTED POPULATION IN 2012 ( 133,119) = 0.00002645198475; (n) The minimum for all authorities of the result of (m) = 0.00000244446668; (o) The result of (m) minus the result of (n) = 0.00002400751807 (p) Capital Financing RNF (0.00001619030862) multiplied by 1,000,000 and divided by PROJECTED POPULATION IN 2012 ( 133,119) = 0.00012162282330; (q) The minimum for all authorities of the result of (p) = 0.00001011071690; (r) The result of (p) minus the result of (q) = 0.00011151210640; (s) The sum of: the result of (l) (0.00029335752408) plus the result of (o) (0.00002400751807) plus the result of (r) (0.00011151210640) = 0.00042887714855 (t) The result of (s) (0.00042887714855) divided by 1,000,000 and multiplied by PROJECTED POPULATION IN 2012 ( 133,119) = 0.00005709169714 (u) The sum for all authorities of the result of (t) = 0.25063394285162 (v) The result of (t) (0.00005709169714) divided by the result of (u) (0.25063394285162) multiplied by £17,352,492,743 = £ 3,952,710

Part E - Relative Resource Amount = £ -1,101,696

From the remaining total of DCLG Formula Grant which the Secretary of State proposes to pay 
to receiving authorities, after paying the Isles of Scilly, and after paying the Grants 
Rolled In Using Tailored Distributions and Top-Up to Avoid Losers From Additional £10 million, 
he proposes to adjust the amount payable by  -26.6% or  £-5,561,160,325 
with respect to the relative resources of authorities. 

The Relative Resource Amount is calculated as follows.

	
(j)   Taxbase (      42,594)
      multiplied by Lower-Tier Share of Taxbase (0.11251453) 
      divided by PROJECTED POPULATION IN 2012 (     133,119)
      = 0.03600103088030;
(k)   The minimum for all authorities of the result of (j)
      = 0.02801731583313;
(l)   The result of (j) minus the result of (k)
      = 0.00798371504717


(m)   The sum of:
      the result of (l)  (0.00798371504717)

      =  0.00798371504717

(n)   The result of (m) (0.00798371504717)
      multiplied by PROJECTED POPULATION (     133,119)
      = 1,062.7841633647

(o)   The sum for all authorities of the result of (n)
      = (5,364,741.377842);

(p)	The result of (n) (1,062.7841633647)
      divided by the result of (o) (5,364,741.377842)
      multiplied by  £-5,561,160,325
      = £    -1,101,696

Part F - Central Allocation = £ 5,944,888

From the remaining total of DCLG Formula Grant which the Secretary of State proposes to pay 
to receiving authorities, after paying the Isles of Scilly, and after paying the Grants 
Rolled In Using Tailored Distributions and Top-Up to Avoid Losers From Additional £10 million, 
he proposes to pay £ 9,115,285,344 with respect to the central 
allocation.

The Central Allocation is calculated as follows. (a) The sum of: the result of (k) from paragraph 5.14 of this Report (0.00138298855115)plus the result of (n) from paragraph 5.14 of this Report (0.00000244446668)plus the result of (q) from paragraph 5.14 of this Report (0.00001011071690) = 0.00139554373473; (b) The result of (a) (0.00139554373473) divided by the result of (u) from paragraph 5.14 of this Report (0.25063394285162) multiplied by £17,352,492,743 = £96.6196447853000); (c) The sum of: the result of (k) from paragraph 5.16 of this Report (0.02801731583313) = 0.02801731583313; (d) The result of (c) (0.02801731583313) divided by the result of (o) from paragraph 5.16 of this Report (5,364,741.377842) multiplied by £-5,561,160,325 = £-29.043112100005; (e) The sum of the results of (b) (£96.6196447853000) plus (d) (£-29.043112100005) = £67.5765326852947; (f) The result of (e) (67.5765326852947) multiplied by PROJECTED POPULATION ( 133,119) = £8,995,720.4545; (g) The sum for all authorities of the result of (f) = £13,793,121,428; (h) The result of (f) (8,995,720.454534) divided by the result of (g) (13,793,121,427.8) multiplied by £ 9,115,285,344 = £ 5,944,888

Part G - Floor Damping = £ -1,597,780

The results from the Part B, Part D, Part E and Part F when added together with Police 
Grant form Formula Grant before floor damping. In order to ensure that authorities receive 
at least a minimum grant change (called the ‘floor’) we adjust the results.

The floor damping calculations are given below.

The final amount of Formula Grant for each authority for 2011-12 is calculated as follows: 


(a)   which represents the previous year’s grant support 
      (£     7,771,925), is the Secretary of State's estimate of adjusted formula
      grant for 2010-11
(b)   (a) (£     7,771,925)
      multiplied by    0.85800

      = £     6,668,311

      = £     6,668,311

(c)   the sum of the following items:
         the Grants Rolling In Using Tailored Distribution as defined in paragraph 5.8 of this Report
         (£             0);
         the Relative Needs Amount as defined in paragraph 5.14 of this Report
         (£     3,952,710); 
         plus the Relative Resource Amount as defined in paragraph 5.16 of this Report
         (£    -1,101,696; 
         plus the Central Allocation as defined in paragraph 5.18 of this Report
         (£     5,944,888); 

      = £     8,795,902

(d)   the result of:
         (c) (£     8,795,902)
         minus (b) (£     6,668,311)
         = £     2,127,591
      multiplied by 0.24901888; 
      plus the result of (b) (£     6,668,311)

      = £     7,198,121

(k)	either the result of (b) (£     6,668,311)
      or the result of (d), (£     7,198,121)
      whichever is the greater, plus the amount at Annex R, if appropriate (£             0)

      = £     7,198,121).

Return to: 2012-13 Local Authority Tables Index


Updated February 2011
Return to Local Government Finance Index
Return to CLG Local Government Index
Return to CLG Home Page
Terms and conditions